The district court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment as the plaintiffs lacked standing and there was no private right of action. The plaintiffs claimed to be business concerns or low-income persons within the meaning of Section 3 and sued the City for allegedly failing to implement Section 3 requirements and violating reporting requirements. The court ruled that the plaintiffs did not identify any opportunities covered by Section 3 that they sought or will seek from the City nor did they explain how the City's alleged violations of Section 3's reporting requirements injured them.
Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief
Defendant City of St. Paul Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Summary Judgment
Trial by Jury Demanded